How to validate data pipelines and migrations so a successful job run also means the business data is correct.
A successful job proves execution completed; it does not prove the business data is correct. Data quality therefore combines pipeline checks, business reconciliation, exception ownership, restart evidence, and end-to-end use of the resulting data.
flowchart LR
A[Transactional source] --> B[Event or extract]
B --> C[Staging]
C --> D[Transformation]
D --> E[Data mart]
E --> F[Dashboard or consumer]
A -. counts fields totals .-> G[Reconciliation evidence]
F -. compare outcome .-> G
Validate schema compatibility, completeness, freshness, source-to-target mapping, transformation rules, null/default/duplicate/reject handling, incremental watermarks, retry and idempotency, key integrity, row-level access, reporting totals, and batch windows.
Input = successfully processed + rejected with reason + intentionally filtered
Support this equation with counts by tenant/date/status/batch, financial control totals, critical field comparisons, hashes for large unchanged partitions, and an exception ledger containing record ID, reason, owner, and disposition.
flowchart LR
A[Discovery] --> B[Source profiling]
B --> C[Mapping approval]
C --> D[Repeated dry runs]
D --> E[Failure and restart tests]
E --> F[Dress rehearsal]
F --> G[Cutover and final delta]
G --> H[Stabilization]
H --> I[Business and technical reconciliation]
Each source record must finish in exactly one known state: migrated, rejected with a documented reason, or intentionally excluded with approval. Sampling can supplement this evidence but cannot replace full-population reconciliation for record accounting.
A hands-on start with Microsoft Playwright for a small set of critical, maintainable browser test journeys.
A layered test architecture that proves risk at the lowest effective level, from static checks to selective end-to-end tests.
A practical, risk-driven wiki for testing software, data, AI, security, performance, and production releases.